I want to share my experience here with the so-called eBay seller protection. Maybe my case will help other sellers protect themselves better. At the same time, I want to show how little one can apparently rely on phone statements and even written messages from eBay customer service. A new original BMW EGR valve with cooler was sold. The buyer paid 718.80 euros for the item plus 19 euros shipping costs. The total amount was therefore 737.80 euros. The buyer paid on May 8, 2026. That same day, the shipment was electronically announced and handed over by me to DHL. I am a DHL business customer and create my shipping labels through my own system. The delivery address transmitted by eBay is automatically adopted in the process. So I neither made up the address myself nor changed it manually. It was shipped exactly to the delivery address that was shown by eBay when the order was placed and transferred to my system. Suddenly the address stored at eBay was supposedly wrong After the shipment was already on its way to Poland, the buyer wrote to me that I had sent the package to the wrong address. He gave me a different spelling or addition to the address and demanded that the delivery address be changed. I explained several times that I had used only the delivery address transmitted by eBay and that the shipment was already on its way. At that point, a change by me was no longer possible. The buyer then informed me in writing himself that he had contacted DHL and that DHL would change the delivery address or had already changed it. According to his own statement, the buyer therefore intervened retrospectively in the ongoing shipping process. Whether and how DHL actually changed the address I cannot say for certain. What is clear, however, is this: I had shipped to the address stored at eBay, while the buyer then independently contacted DHL. DHL marks the shipment as delivered The DHL tracking showed the following progress: Shipped on May 8, 2026 Arrival in Poland on May 13 Loaded into the delivery vehicle on May 14 temporary note about an address error on May 18 successful delivery on May 19, 2026 at 10:12 a.m. in Poland The final DHL status was clear: “The shipment was successfully delivered.” Nevertheless, the buyer claimed that he had not received the package. Yet he had previously stated himself that he had contacted DHL about an address change. The buyer opens a case – eBay withholds my money On May 23, the buyer contacted eBay customer service and opened a case for an allegedly not received item. At the same time, my payouts were withheld. I responded immediately and contacted eBay by phone several times. I explained the full situation: shipment to the address transmitted by eBay automatic transfer of the address into my DHL system subsequent attempt by the buyer to change the address with DHL successful delivery shown in the tracking written messages from the buyer in which he himself confirmed contacting DHL Several times I was told by phone that I did not need to do anything further and that the matter would be resolved in my favor. Since the buyer was in Poland, the case would just need to be reviewed by the responsible department. In writing, it was even decided provisionally in my favor On May 28, I received a written message from eBay customer service. It said, in essence, that the case had been carefully reviewed and that, based on the information available, a provisional decision in my favor had been made. Because of the higher amount, an expert team should review the case again. This could take a few days. I should be patient and would be informed of the final decision. On June 2, eBay then suddenly demanded proof of signature from the shipping provider. The case was allegedly put on hold for five days for this purpose. The reason given was that it was a transaction on the Polish eBay site and therefore, despite the positive DHL tracking, an additional proof of signature was required. I was surprised by this and called customer service again. There I was reassured once more. I was still told that, due to the clear circumstances, the case would go in my favor. Especially contradictory: On June 8 – that is, after the alleged five-day period had expired – I received another written message from eBay. It again said that the case had been reviewed and that a provisional decision in my favor had been made. The expert team would review the case conclusively within 48 hours. How else is a seller supposed to understand this message than that the matter is still being processed and that he can rely on the customer service statements? Despite all assurances, eBay decides for the buyer A few days later, the U-turn came. eBay informed me that the case had been closed in the buyer’s favor because the requested proof of signature had not been submitted within the set deadline. The normal tracking showing successful delivery suddenly was no longer sufficient. The fact that the buyer had, according to his own statement, arranged an address change with DHL himself apparently no longer mattered either. The purchase price was refunded to the buyer. That left me without the goods and without the money, amounting to almost 740 euros. DHL supplies the proof of signature afterward I initiated an investigation with DHL and requested the full delivery confirmation. On July 14, 2026, I finally received the signature confirmation and forwarded it to eBay that same day. So now exactly the document eBay had requested was available. Even so, my appeal was rejected again. eBay did explicitly confirm that I had shipped the item to the stated delivery address. However, the rejection was justified on the grounds that the proof of signature had not been submitted within the previously set five-day deadline. In other words: proof of delivery exists, it was sent by DHL and submitted to eBay immediately afterward – but eBay ignores it because DHL did not provide it within an extremely short deadline. How is a seller supposed to obtain an official proof of delivery for an international shipment within five days if the shipping provider needs significantly longer to process an investigation? What bothers me most My biggest criticism is not just the deadline. What is especially frustrating is that eBay customer service repeatedly gave me the impression, by phone and even in writing, that the case would be decided in my favor. On May 28, it was stated in writing: provisional decision in my favor. On June 8, it was again stated in writing: provisional decision in my favor, final review within 48 hours. At the same time, a deadline is supposedly already said to have expired, and missing it was later given as the sole reason for the refund to the buyer. Why contact customer service at all if its statements ultimately have no meaning? Why is a seller repeatedly asked to wait if he is then blamed precisely for that waiting? What does seller protection mean in this case? I have: shipped to the delivery address transmitted by eBay, automatically transferred the address unchanged into my shipping label, provided valid DHL tracking, proven successful delivery, documented the buyer’s messages, shown that the buyer himself contacted DHL about an address change, reacted immediately to the opened case, called eBay customer service several times, received a written provisional decision in my favor twice, and later additionally submitted DHL’s official proof of signature. Nevertheless, the buyer got his money back. Now I have neither the goods nor the purchase price. The buyer has his money back and, according to DHL, a shipment was successfully delivered. For me, that is not seller protection. It is a system in which a seller can lose despite proof of delivery, while verbal assurances and written messages from customer service are apparently worthless. Of course, looking back, I should have explicitly booked an additional delivery against signature at the time of shipping. eBay refers to the fact that for a total value of more than 550 euros, a signature confirmation is required. But that does not explain why customer service repeatedly told me the decision would be in my favor and made me wait. It also does not explain why a later submitted actual proof of signature is completely ignored. My questions to the community: Has anyone already experienced a similar case? How can a proven delivery and a later submitted proof of signature count for less than a five-day deadline that is practically impossible for the shipping provider to meet? And what value do decisions and statements from eBay customer service have if they are later reversed without consequences? For me, eBay seller protection after this experience unfortunately means: almost 740 euros lost despite proven delivery.